Showing posts with label mortgage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mortgage. Show all posts

Monday, 1 August 2011

6.5 million Americans are over 30 days late on their mortgage payment

foreclosure home in america 6.5 million Americans are over 30 days late on their mortgage payment

Lender Processing Services is reporting the total American loan delinquency rate of mortgage borrowers whose loans are 30 days or more past due but not yet in foreclosure, is now at 8.15%, thus, the total number of homes in delinquency is 4,285,000 and with foreclosures, the number is an astonishing 6,452,000.

The home loan delinquency rate is up 2.4% from May but down 14.7% from June 2011.

Florida, Nevada, Mississippi, New Jersey and Illinois currently have the highest rates of delinquencies while the lowest rates of delinquencies are in Montana, Wyoming, Alaska, South Dakota and North Dakota.

Currently, the lending industry is in a very tight spot as recent reports reveal that not only is robo-signing still going on despite bank denial, thousands of loans that were packaged and sold to investors don’t even have promissory notes, and add to all that mess, courts across the nation are saying MERS doesn’t have the authority to issue foreclosure rights to a bank. (Read more on these topics here.)

All of these issues are potentially destructive to the foreclosure process and given that over six million homeowners are in danger of foreclosure are potentially looking at a different process altogether. Banks are questioning who has the authority to do what and homeowners are suing on technicalities and with no promissory note or proof that a bank even owns a loan, banks are losing foreclosure suits in rising numbers.

Although delinquencies are up a bit this month, they are down over the past year by a healthy margin, but will it matter if courts are not upholding foreclosures? How will banks respond? So far, the same problems plaguing the banks and have led to endless probes and even criminal charges and no changes have been made, so will courts denying foreclosures implement change? Time will tell.



This article published on Thursday, July 21st, 2011 at 12:06 am | Contact the editor Tags: featured, mortgage crisis, real estate economy, Real Estate News

Category: Economy

Tara Steele is the News Director at AgentGenius, covering real estate news, technology news and everything in between. If you’d like to reach Tara with a question, comment, press release or hot news tip, she frequently checks her email, simply click the link below.

Email Tara Steele

View the original article here

Saturday, 30 July 2011

New regulations push MetLife bank to close, what of the mortgage division?

metlife building New regulations push MetLife bank to close, what of the mortgage division?

MetLife Inc. has announced that it is considering selling their MetLife Bank which currently offers traditional banking such as depository business, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. The MetLife Home Loans division, however, is not being considered as part of the sale. The bank’s current assets total $15.6 billion with $9.3 million in deposits.

According to MetLife, they have decided that a bank holding company structure is no longer appropriate despite having been considered a “systematically important financial institution.” They are facing scrutiny from the Federal Reserve Board and regulations like the Dodd-Frank act have loomed overhead.

“MetLife Bank represented just two percent of MetLife Inc.’s first quarter 2011 operating earnings, and we do not believe it is appropriate for the overwhelming majority of our business to be governed by regulations written for banking institutions,” said Steven Kandarian, President and CEO of MetLife Inc. in a statement.

“In a highly competitive global insurance marketplace, it is imperative that MetLife be able to operate on a level playing field with other insurance companies,” Kandarian said.

The ten year old division initially began offering retail savings products online and their home loans division which will remain in tact was created in 2008 when they had acquired EverBank mortgage and First Horizon Home Loans from from First Tennessee Bank.

“We are pursuing a sale of our depository operations and in the future will concentrate on our mortgage banking businesses (including forward and reverse mortgage origination, servicing and warehouse lending). MetLife Home Loans will remain a part of the MetLife enterprise,” said an internal company memo obtained by National Mortgage Professional Magazine (NMPM).

NMPM reports that “the company contends that it is committed to growth strategies in all of its mortgage banking businesses, including focusing on the continued success of its jumbo mortgage products.”

“The mortgage business often provides access to the bulk of a person’s wealth and, therefore, is a natural part of financial and retirement planning,” noted the memo. “In addition, the mortgage product provides a natural hedge to the insurance business and a diversified entry point to customer acquisition.”

The major changes to the mortgage division over the next year will include a requirement of their loan originators to seek licensing given their dropping of the bank charger, and some states will require fulfillment and loss mitigation employees.

“The elephant in the room here is the fact that all of MetLife’s LOs will now have to become licensed,” said Eric Tishaw, chief operating officer of Hazel Green, Ala.-based Hometown Lenders. “A significant portion of MetLife’s recent growth has come from entire branch networks and producers making lateral moves from competitors in an effort to make a move to a company where licensing would not be required, obviously to avoid the hassles of becoming licensed (and the fear of failing!). Those producers that MetLife are able to both retain and get licensed will no doubt be re-evaluating their compensation levels and comparing that to what they could get elsewhere working for a smaller lender, who will be able to offer them relief from big-bank red tape and who will give them more flexibility, more products and greater autonomy.”

MetLife’s dropping of their bank division is indicative of changing governmental regulations and analysts suspect that such a large closure could change the conversation in Washington about mortgage regulation.



This article published on Friday, July 22nd, 2011 at 12:03 am | Contact the editor Tags: featured, mortgage crisis, Real Estate News

Category: News

AgentGenius is a rapidly growing real estate social media, tech, news, and opinion site built and designed by and for the on-the-go agent. Our mission is to be a positive force in the industry, led by people inside of real estate. We aim to keep you up to date on trends that we study closely in order to forecast what’s next on the horizon.

Email AGBeat News

View the original article here

Friday, 29 July 2011

Another mortgage crisis- robo-signing continues, loans missing, MERS under fire

housing on fire mortgage crisis Another mortgage crisis robo signing continues, loans missing, MERS under fire

Is another mortgage crisis among us or is it the same crisis that has supposedly been resolved and rectified? Are all of the pieces that crashed housing still lying around acting as accelerant to the fire that is housing? Possibly.

This week, Reuters’ Scott Paltrow did an extensive study on robo-signing, missing promissory notes and the status of MERS, all of which were supposedly no longer problematic in the American mortgage world.

Recently, we asked who was to blame for the economic crisis? Fingers pointed everywhere with a large group blaming the robo-signing scandal (where banks didn’t manually review documents before foreclosure leading to illegal foreclosures on wrong addresses, homes paid in full and various other mistakes), including state and federal agencies seeking damages.

“The robo-signing debacle is commonly pointed to as a major cause of the economic downturn, as companies like Lender Processing Services (LPS) and CoreLogic, both having recently been sued by the FDIC who says they provided automated inflated appraisals causing banks to make investments on loans they otherwise wouldn’t have, thus taking a major financial hit.”

At the end of 2010, banks nearly unanimously said they were halting robo-signings so that these wrongful (read: illegal) foreclosures would come to a stop. Today, Reuters’ investigation revealed that robo-signatures numbered in the thousands with “known robo-signers” still in action. How can this be?

The banks say it is a technicality, that all homes discovered with flawed paperwork were legitimately under foreclosure. Regardless, robo-signing isn’t over even though banks claimed they were and despite many lawsuits regarding robo-signatures and despite many believing robo-signing is the root of the entire economic collapse.

In yet another report, Reuters unveiled a highly ignored yet highly flammable housing issue. “There are signs, however, that servicers resort to doubtful documents because they have no choice if they are determined to foreclose: To a great extent, originals simply don’t exist. It’s one of the overlooked legacies of the housing boom.”

In a “rush” to get loan packages sold to investors, many banks either destroyed or failed to turn over original promissory notes or mortgage documents, both of which are legally required in order to convey ownership. Many of these banks have since gone under.

“From 2004 through the end of the housing boom in 2006, more than half of all new mortgages were securitized and sold to such pools, known as mortgage-securitization trusts, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.”

That is a substantial amount of paperwork eternally missing, how can many foreclosures be anything but contested if a bank now owning a mortgage can’t even prove they own the loan?

“The result is that trusts may be out many billions of dollars, says Matthew Weidner, a lawyer who specializes in mortgage litigation. If proper procedures are followed now, foreclosures could slow to a trickle. And a cloud would hang over title to millions of homes, potentially further depressing the housing market.”

Reuters’ expose on Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) is where the cracks in the continuing mortgage crisis begin to show.

With only 50 full time employees, MERS “claims to own about half of all mortgages in the United States, roughly 60 million loans, and is involved in about 60 percent of new mortgages issued.”

MERS was established by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac just over 15 years ago in conjunction with several major banks as a means to expedite the loan recording process as it used to be done through individual county clerk offices which was slow. “The founders went ahead even though no state laws authorized them to bypass the required filing with clerks,” according to Reuters.

Testimony was uncovered from 2009 where MERS employees noted they “did little but maintain the computer database” and that “For a $25 fee, employees of any of the 3,000 loan servicers that belonged to MERS could get themselves designated as a MERS “vice president” or “assistant secretary,” authorized to sign official documents on behalf of MERS.”

This spring, federal regulators included MERS along with 14 lenders as “engaged in unsafe or unsound practices” in transferring mortgages, requiring them to reform even though they still claim no wrongdoing.

Reuters said, “In practice, when servicers needed to create mortgage assignments to replace missing ones for foreclosure cases, their own employees, signing as MERS officials, printed out newminted documents and signed their names to them. MERS has served in effect as an instant teller machine for mortgage assignments. Servicers simply have their own employees sign the needed documents as MERS officials.”

Courts for years have upheld MERS assignments despite homeowners’ challenges of their documentation. Now, several states are noting that MERS doesn’t own the note, therefore, it has no power to transfer to servicers the right to foreclose.

Each of these alone would be enough to threaten housing, but together, there is a real danger looming. Banks have been ordered to reform and claim they have done so, yet robo-signing continues. Foreclosures are occurring at staggering rates and although it is not in dispute whether or not most of them are actual defaults, the fact that original promissory notes are gone forever leaves a huge question mark as to how a foreclosure can hold up in court without a bank being able to prove ownership of the loan? Furthermore, MERS claims to own half of all American loans and courts are beginning to rule that it was never legal for them to transfer the right to foreclose in the first place.

The silver lining is that discovery that the same issues are still at hand that caused much of the deterioration of the real estate sector could possibly lead to resolution of some sort. Without resolution, however, if these three factors remain, the majority of foreclosures) whether in legitimate default or not) will not hold up in court.



This article published on Tuesday, July 19th, 2011 at 5:00 am | Contact the editor Tags: featured, mortgage crisis, Real Estate News

Category: News

AgentGenius is a rapidly growing real estate social media, tech, news, and opinion site built and designed by and for the on-the-go agent. Our mission is to be a positive force in the industry, led by people inside of real estate. We aim to keep you up to date on trends that we study closely in order to forecast what’s next on the horizon.

Email AGBeat News

View the original article here